logo
Contact Us Studio Store Me Gallery Client List News & Blog About The Artist Caricatures Mad Art Portfolio.php
About The Artist

Archive for March, 2010

Sketch o’the Week

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

Our Sketch o’the Week series of ink-wash caricatures of the cast of “LOST” continues with this one of Naveen Andrews, who plays the former Iraqi Republican guardsman and interrogator Sayid Jarrah. I was informed by my neighbor Kim, a fellow LOST fanatic, that if my next subject was not Sayid she would have me killed. I live to draw another day.

On the Drawing Board- 3/30/10

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

Not a whole lot on the board right now. That’s a good thing as I have to travel over the next two weeks opening up my theme park operations in Missouri and Massachusetts. I always have to turn down a few jobs at this time of year because of the theme park demands. I just wrapped up a series of storyboards for some animated segments in a movie as well as a few additional character designs for it, and another Marlin Co. poster illustration.

Here are the things I am currently working on:

  • 2010 NCS Reubens T-Shirt Art- My annual illustration for the cartoonists weekend
  • Two personal projects- Real painting!
  • Movie Poster- For the film I did the animated characters and storyboards for

Here’s the art for the latest Marlin workplace poster. … Click each image for a closer look:


Pencil Roughs


Final inks

As you can see the client had a few changes. They wanted the firefighters on each side of the grill to be wearing hazmat suits as opposed to regular firefighting gear, and one to have a hose. They also wanted to lose two of the firefighters in the background.


The finished illustration…

Recommended Blog

Monday, March 29th, 2010


Artwork by Anton Emdin

Those who frequent The MAD Blog know I do not lightly recommend artist’s blogs or websites. There are so many good ones (and so, SO many bad ones) that singling one out is tough to do.

However, I have no problem in recommending the spankin’ new blog of Australian cartoonist and illustrator Anton Emdin. Anton sat next to me at the Australian Cartoonist Association’s Stanley Awards:


Anton and me down under

… where he won a Stanley for Best Illustrator. As it happens he is also one of the nominees for the National Cartoonists Society’s divisional award for best Magazine Illustration/ Magazine Feature along with NYC illustrator Ray Alma and yours truly. I neglected to tell him that this will be my 6th, count ‘em… SIXTH, nomination in this division and I have not won yet. I am the Susan Lucci of the NCS Magazine Illustration/Magazine Feature division. Either Anton or Ray have it in the bag.

Anton’s work is really terrific. Cartoony and fun as well as beautifully crafted with a strong sense of composition and design. Plus, as you can see from the sample above, he does work for the Australian version of MAD! Great work, and well worth a look.

Sunday Mailbag

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

Q: I’m just wondering if there are any special consideration you need to take in your illustrations, colour wise, that you know are going to be printed?  I know in animation, when a background is being painted in Photoshop, there’s a filter that checks if the colours will show up on TV, but is there similar issues with colouring for print?

A: There are a few things you need to keep in mind about colors in print, especially when it comes to digitally created art.

First off, and probably the most immediate concern, is the difference between the colors you see on the screen and that which ends up in print. It’s difficult to get the two to come close to being a match, because the nature of the two images, computer screen and printed page, as so different.

The image on your screen is produced using three colors, red, green and blue (RGB) at a resolution of usually 72 dots per inch. However because the computer screen displays these using an ADDITIVE color system (meaning a 0% of all colors equals black)  and as a transilluminated image (the colored light shines out from the screen) an image on the computer can display millions of colors with  much greater range of contrast and intensity as well as a broader and more subtle range of color (color gamut).

A printed page image, using a standard four-color process, is printed using four colored inks: cyan, magenta, yellow and black. Printing uses a SUBTRACTIVE color system (meaning a 0% of all colors equals no color or the blank paper) and relies on light reflected from the surface of the page as opposed to light from within. This limits the printed page’s colors, contrast and intensity. All this leads to a difference between what you see on the screen and what gets printed on the page.

With a good monitor and a color calibration system you can get some decent results with color matching, but since different magazines use different paper stocks, different ink densities and other factors, color will never be across the board consistent. Also the greater color gamut of a computer monitor can show you colors on the screen you cannot ever replicate in CMYK print. Personally I use the eyeball method. I take printed versions of my illustrations and hold them up to the monitor, then adjust the color balance to get as close as I can to the printed version. I have found I can get close that way, especially if I choose to match a certain range of colors more than others, and then whatever the differences between client’s printing end up negligible. I have found that by matching up the fleshtones in my images I get good results… as long as I keep in mind that the blues in my image need to be more subdued as they will print darker and more intense than the screen shows. When doing work I know will be printed on newsprint or a similar spongy stock I purposefully paint more garishly with the color knowing it will be muted due to the soaking in of the ink on the paper. I do this when I do newspaper illustrations or work for one of the Scholastic magazines.

I also always color my images as CMYK images in PhotoShop, as opposed to coloring them as RGB and then converting them. It doesn’t seem like it but the screen color does change when you do that conversion and it will be different than if you made the color choices in a CMYK mode in the first place. Also, PhotoShop will show you a little exclamation point symbol in the color palette if you have selected a color that is impossible to reproduce in print and will suggest the closest match to it that is reproducible.

One thing to keep in mind is the ink density of the target printing process. Ink density refers to the percentage of coverage of the four different inks on the paper of a given magazine or publication. Printers use a scale of 0% to 400%, 0% being on ink and 400% being 100% ink coverage of all four colors. What the ink density is depends a lot on the type of paper and the quality of the printing… glossy and heavier stock can handle a higher ink density than thinner or more porous paper. No matter what the type of paper, no one can use 400% ink density… the ink would literally never dry on the page as it could be too thick and gooey. A high quality, glossy magazine might allow an ink density of 300% or a tad more… this results in very rich blacks and a good contrast image. A less expensive printing process might have a max ink density of 270-280%, which leaves a bit to be desired in the contrast and black areas.

PhotoShop already knows this, and the color profile of a given image can have the ink density capped at any level one might desire. The default PhotoShop CMYK profile, U.S. Web Coated (SWOP) v2, caps the ink density at 300%. If you select what seems like “total” black from the PhotoShop swatch pallet and switch to the CMYK sliders you will see that it is not truly total black… that would be 400% ink density with 100% of all four colors. It is what they call a “rich” black, usually the following formula:

  • Cyan- 75%
  • Magenta- 68%
  • Yellow- 67%
  • Black- 90%

That equals a total ink density for black, the darkest of all the colors, at exactly 300%. This is usually good for most printers, but if you notice a grayness and lack of contrast to your images from a client that will be a recurring one, you might want to ask about the ink density their print process allows. Not that you can change it, but by coloring with that ink density as the max in a custom color profile, you can avoid the washing out of other colors as well as your blacks by avoiding having them do a color profile conversion themselves.

This is the kind of stuff production people have to deal with all the time, and if you can avoid having them change or convert your image you will end up having more control over the final results… leading to less surprises when the illustration hits the stands.

Some Google searches on “matching screen to CMYK print colors” and “calibrating an RGB monitor for CMYK printing” will bring you a host of useful articles.

Thanks to Seth Wilks for the question. If you have a question you want answered for the mailbag about cartooning, illustration, MAD Magazine, caricature or similar, e-mail me and I’ll try and answer it here!

IT’S PETITIONIN’ TIME!!

Saturday, March 27th, 2010


© ????- (ok… © Marvel Comics until further notice)

Marvel Comic’s superheroes are famous for being different than the typical type because they are written as having to deal with personal and human issues and problems as often as they do the superhuman kind.

Apparently Marvel itself is no different.

A legal battle is shaping up pitting Marvel Comics and its new parent the Walt Disney Company against the heirs of legendary comic book artist Jack Kirby, who are arguing that a portion of the copyrights to many of Marvel’s most marketable characters belong to their late father and his estate. This is similar in some respects to the recent lawsuit between the heirs of Jerry Siegel and DC Comics/Warner Bros. In fact, the same lawyer in that case is representing the Kirby family.

No doubt this legal process will take many years to clear up once all appeals and such are exhausted. It does have some far reaching copyright implications, though. There are a lot of complexities and angles to argue, but essentially I think it all boils down to one thing… did Marvel observe the legal niceties way back in the 60′s when that kind of thing was sometimes an afterthought and was all the work Kirby did legally work-for-hire? If Marvel has signed agreements from Kirby covering all the work he did for them, then they have a strong legal position even if Kirby did the work from his home using materials he provided. If they can’t produce those signed agreements… then that is another story. This could end up having a bearing on the rights of many golden and silver age artists and the rights they relinquished on characters that are being mined as brands today.

Kirby had a significant hand in co-creating most of Marvel’s most popular and most marketable characters. With big money films having been produced and on the horizon, and all the marketing, toys and tie-ins associated with them, there is big, big money at stake. This should be a long and interesting story.

Shoulder Update: One year Later…

Friday, March 26th, 2010


Before…


March 19th, 2008


four months after surgery…


Did you think I was kidding???

It has officially been one year and a handful of days since I got my left rotator cuff repaired via arthroscopic surgery. So, here is the latest update..

I am pleased to say I am back in the gym and near 100% again. I still have a lack of strength and stability when my shoulder is in certain positions, but steady rehab and a slow progression into real weightlifting has me doing most exercises pain free as long as I don’t overdo the weight. I am gradually building strength and size again, and hope by the end of May to be back to my usual bulk and power. Slow and steady wins the race…

The good news is that any soreness and lack of stability is just a function of getting back in shape and not a failure of the repair. Indeed, my RIGHT shoulder, which had a partial tear in it as well, is giving me more problems in some ways than the surgically repaired left one. Being careful and listening to my body will be all I need to ease back into my bodybuilding routines. I have already gained back a great deal of my lost size and the strength will follow quickly. A 300 plus lb bench press only a month or two away!

New Treasure for the Wall of Shame!

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

Technically, since I redid my studio the “Wall of Shame” that previously existed on the walls outside my studio now reside inside the studio on several walls… the concept still lives, however.

To wit, the newest addition to the “Wall of Shame” just arrived the other day and is on it’s way to the frame shop. After said framing it will proudly hang in the studio as a member of the WOS.

In the most recent issue of MAD, I did the art for the parody of the TV show “The Big Bang Theory”. The TV show’s producer, Chuck Lorre, is a fan of MAD and is always enthusiastic about seeing his shows lampooned in the magazine. After getting wind somehow of the publication of the parody in MAD #503, Mr. Lorre contacted MAD and subsequently me about getting the art from the splash page for his offices. Like his show “2 and a Half Men”, we made an arrangement that included me sending an over-sized print of the splash to get signatures from the cast members and Mr. Lorre as well.

Here is the result, again soon to be hanging in the newly remodeled studio ( I added the signature “keys”):


Click for a closer look…

Awesome! I’m actually a big fan of the show. This will be great to hang in the studio and stare at while I am procrastinating.

Sketch o’the Week

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

This week we continue our ink-wash sketches of the characters of the TV show “LOST” with Terry O’Quinn AKA John Locke AKA Smokey the Monster.

Fun With Watercolors in NYC

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010


Hermann at work

I just got back last night from a quick weekend trip to NYC where illustrators Ed Steckley, Ray Alma and I got the rare opportunity to work with the fantastic Hermann Mejia while he shared some of his watercolor expertise with us at Ed’s pad in Sunnyside (Queens). I haven’t really worked much with watercolor before (took a class once a million years ago), so this was a pretty new experience for me. I loved getting a chance to hang out with these talented artists, experiment with a new medium and especially to watch a true master of watercolor work his magic.


Ed slings some pigment


Herman shows how to lay down a large color area


Hermann works with the slow student…


Ed’s wife Heather’s put on a lavish spread of food!

I did a few color studies and basically dabbled about with the paints:


Overworked the hell out of this one…


This one was looser and much less labored over…

I liked the medium quite a bit, and I’m sure we’ll see some watercolor “sketches” now and again for the “sketch o’the week”. Actually some of the stuff I learned I’ll out to use doing my ink wash caricatures of the LOST cast… which continues tomorrow!

Watercoloring in NYC

Sunday, March 21st, 2010

Last week my good friend, illustrator and caricaturist Ed Steckley, called me to chat and told me about a cool painting get together he and some fellow pals had planned for the weekend. Ed was going to host a watercolor mini-class by MAD illustrator Hermann Mejia for just he and another MAD artist, Ray Alma. He invited me to tag along.

Hello frequent flyer mile awards.

I cashed in a few of those frequent flyer miles and spent the weekend in NYC. On Saturday we bummed around Brooklyn, and checked out Hermann’s show at RocketShip comics on Smith St. See pics of the show below.

Wow. I had seen a few of Hernann’s orginals before but these were really spectacular.

What a rare opportunity to be shown some watercolor techniques by a true master. The “class” was terrific and I will post about it and some of the work I did tommorrow.

Meanwhile if you are in the NYC area stop by Rocketship Comics in Brooklyn to see some amazing work by an amazing artist.

 

Home ||Portfolio | MAD Art | Caricatures | About the Artist | The MAD Blog | Client List | Me Gallery | Studio Store | Contact Us

All images on this site are copyright © byTom Richmond, (except those specifically credited to other artists, in which case are copyright © by the individual artist) all rights reserved, and cannot be duplicated, printed, displayed or used in any fashion without the express written consent of the artist.







MAD MAGAZINE!
National Cartoonist Society
International Society of Caricature Artists