<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lampooners Lampooned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrichmond.com/blog/2009/12/11/the-lampooners-lampooned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrichmond.com/blog/2009/12/11/the-lampooners-lampooned/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-lampooners-lampooned</link>
	<description>Tom Richmond- Cartoonist and Humorous Illustrator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:26:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Potter Zebby</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrichmond.com/blog/2009/12/11/the-lampooners-lampooned/comment-page-1/#comment-56951</link>
		<dc:creator>Potter Zebby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrichmond.com/blog/?p=6936#comment-56951</guid>
		<description>Same as today: CHEAP.

Lampoon&#039;s art director Michael Gross certainly wasn&#039;t under the impression that it was &quot;needling with love&quot; or &quot;the ultimate compliment.&quot;  Of course, Mike Gross is not exactly the humblest, nor the happiest guy in publishing history.

Gross:  &quot;I didn&#039;t like anybody who did work for [MAD] Magazine, ever.  Probably the only exception is Sergio Aragones... We so f--king nailed it... We said, &#039;We&#039;ve grown up, but MAD hasn&#039;t.&#039;  They take themselves so f--king seriously.  It&#039;s humorous.  So we were on a mission to put the record straight with that parody.  We were arrogant, of course... If you notice, there&#039;s a great homage in there to the talent.  Those people we respected, and we bowed our heads and said, &#039;MAD&#039;s not the magazine it was anymore, but they also don&#039;t have these guys anymore.&#039;&quot;

Here&#039;s an unedited segment of Bill Gaines, speaking at a Q-and-A session at the 1972 EC Fan Convention:
QUESTION FROM AUDIENCE MEMBER #1:  What do you think of the National Lampoon?
BILL GAINES:  What&#039;s that?  [crowd laughs]  It&#039;s a good effort.
AUDIENCE MEMBER #1 (cont.):  What did you think of their MAD parody?
GAINES:  Pretty funny.  In parts, it was very funny.
QUESTION FROM AUDIENCE MEMBER #2:  The National Lampoon brought out a piece on MAD.  What did you think of it?  [audience snickers]
GAINES:  I didn&#039;t like that article at all.  [big laugh from audience, applause]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same as today: CHEAP.</p>
<p>Lampoon&#8217;s art director Michael Gross certainly wasn&#8217;t under the impression that it was &#8220;needling with love&#8221; or &#8220;the ultimate compliment.&#8221;  Of course, Mike Gross is not exactly the humblest, nor the happiest guy in publishing history.</p>
<p>Gross:  &#8220;I didn&#8217;t like anybody who did work for [MAD] Magazine, ever.  Probably the only exception is Sergio Aragones&#8230; We so f&#8211;king nailed it&#8230; We said, &#8216;We&#8217;ve grown up, but MAD hasn&#8217;t.&#8217;  They take themselves so f&#8211;king seriously.  It&#8217;s humorous.  So we were on a mission to put the record straight with that parody.  We were arrogant, of course&#8230; If you notice, there&#8217;s a great homage in there to the talent.  Those people we respected, and we bowed our heads and said, &#8216;MAD&#8217;s not the magazine it was anymore, but they also don&#8217;t have these guys anymore.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an unedited segment of Bill Gaines, speaking at a Q-and-A session at the 1972 EC Fan Convention:<br />
QUESTION FROM AUDIENCE MEMBER #1:  What do you think of the National Lampoon?<br />
BILL GAINES:  What&#8217;s that?  [crowd laughs]  It&#8217;s a good effort.<br />
AUDIENCE MEMBER #1 (cont.):  What did you think of their MAD parody?<br />
GAINES:  Pretty funny.  In parts, it was very funny.<br />
QUESTION FROM AUDIENCE MEMBER #2:  The National Lampoon brought out a piece on MAD.  What did you think of it?  [audience snickers]<br />
GAINES:  I didn&#8217;t like that article at all.  [big laugh from audience, applause]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharprm</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrichmond.com/blog/2009/12/11/the-lampooners-lampooned/comment-page-1/#comment-56947</link>
		<dc:creator>sharprm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrichmond.com/blog/?p=6936#comment-56947</guid>
		<description>how much was 40 cents back then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how much was 40 cents back then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWB</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrichmond.com/blog/2009/12/11/the-lampooners-lampooned/comment-page-1/#comment-56945</link>
		<dc:creator>JWB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 06:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrichmond.com/blog/?p=6936#comment-56945</guid>
		<description>Wow! That brings back memories! Forgot about that Alfred cover by &quot;Jazzy&quot; Johnny Romita! Lampoon did some great comic book parodies(&quot;Tarzan of the Cows&quot;, &quot;G. Gordon Liddy:Agent of C.R.E.E.P.&quot;). And of course the funnies section of their Sunday newspaper parody. And if we&#039;re talking about parodies of parodies let&#039;s not forget the great Onion newspaper spoof Mad did just a couple of years ago!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! That brings back memories! Forgot about that Alfred cover by &#8220;Jazzy&#8221; Johnny Romita! Lampoon did some great comic book parodies(&#8220;Tarzan of the Cows&#8221;, &#8220;G. Gordon Liddy:Agent of C.R.E.E.P.&#8221;). And of course the funnies section of their Sunday newspaper parody. And if we&#8217;re talking about parodies of parodies let&#8217;s not forget the great Onion newspaper spoof Mad did just a couple of years ago!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gustavo</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrichmond.com/blog/2009/12/11/the-lampooners-lampooned/comment-page-1/#comment-56942</link>
		<dc:creator>gustavo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrichmond.com/blog/?p=6936#comment-56942</guid>
		<description>Amazing! The parody of a parody!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing! The parody of a parody!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steckley</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrichmond.com/blog/2009/12/11/the-lampooners-lampooned/comment-page-1/#comment-56939</link>
		<dc:creator>Steckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrichmond.com/blog/?p=6936#comment-56939</guid>
		<description>This parody was finally published a few years ago in a bound collection of NL magazine parodies, appropriately titled &#039;Magazine Rack&#039;. 
In addition to the Mad parody, there&#039;s parodies of Playboy, Better Homes, Readers Digest and tons more.  Well worth the cover price.  
Be warned though, some of it is pretty durn off color...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This parody was finally published a few years ago in a bound collection of NL magazine parodies, appropriately titled &#8216;Magazine Rack&#8217;.<br />
In addition to the Mad parody, there&#8217;s parodies of Playboy, Better Homes, Readers Digest and tons more.  Well worth the cover price.<br />
Be warned though, some of it is pretty durn off color&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

